IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v17y2000i2-3p160-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DEVOLUTION and RECENTRALIZATION OF WELFARE ADMINISTRATION: Implications for “New Federalism”

Author

Listed:
  • Richard V. Adkisson
  • James T. Peach

Abstract

When the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program was created, participating states were made responsible for the administration of the program. States could choose between administering the program themselves or allowing local administration under state supervision. Initially, 32 of the 50 states (64%) opted for the state‐supervised, locally‐administered structure. By 1990, only 15 states (30%) were operating under state‐supervised systems. Amid decades of talk about federal‐to‐state decentralization, seventeen states have chosen to centralize their welfare administration systems. This choice is an important one as there is substantial evidence indicating that administrative structure is an important determinant of program delivery costs and equity. This article uses a logit model to identify the characteristics that have influenced state choice of administrative model. The results suggest that decisions to centralize welfare administration have been systematic choices, driven by geographic, demographic, economic, and political considerations unique to each state.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard V. Adkisson & James T. Peach, 2000. "DEVOLUTION and RECENTRALIZATION OF WELFARE ADMINISTRATION: Implications for “New Federalism”," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 17(2‐3), pages 160-178, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:17:y:2000:i:2-3:p:160-178
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00922.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00922.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00922.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joe Soss & Richard C. Fording & Sanford F. Schram, 2008. "The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 536-553, July.
    2. Michael Craw, 2015. "The Effect of Fragmentation and Second-Order Devolution on Efficacy of Local Public Welfare Policy," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 45(2), pages 270-296.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:17:y:2000:i:2-3:p:160-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.