IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v53y2025i5p1105-1137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doing good and doing well: The relationships between ESG and stock returns of REITs

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Rui Dominic Neo
  • Tien Foo Sing
  • Wenwen Wang

Abstract

The study empirically tests the relationships between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and the stock performance of real estate investment trusts (REITs). It also examines the effects of climate change risk salience of REIT investors on excess market risk premia for REITs with and without ESG ratings. Using 413 REITs from the United States and other developed countries from 2018 to 2022, our empirical results show significant negative relationships between ESG ratings and ex post stock returns of REITs. We find that ESG‐rated REITs underperform non–ESG‐rated REITs by up to 2.4% in monthly price returns and 1.7% in monthly total returns. We also estimate lower excess market risk premia in the capital asset pricing models (CAPMs) for ESG‐rated REITs. However, the estimated risk premia for ESG‐rated REITs are not correlated with climate risk concerns. We find that ESG‐rated REITs incurred high compensations for the Board and Senior Management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Rui Dominic Neo & Tien Foo Sing & Wenwen Wang, 2025. "Doing good and doing well: The relationships between ESG and stock returns of REITs," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 53(5), pages 1105-1137, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:53:y:2025:i:5:p:1105-1137
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12534
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.12534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:53:y:2025:i:5:p:1105-1137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.