IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v62y2014i3p634-651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reclaiming Feminist Futures: Co-opted and Progressive Politics in a Neo-liberal Age

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Eschle
  • Bice Maiguashca

Abstract

type="main"> This article engages with the influential narrative about the co-optation of feminism in conditions of neo-liberalism put forward by prominent feminist thinkers Nancy Fraser, Hester Eisenstein and Angela McRobbie. After drawing out the twin visions of ‘progressive’ feminist politics that undergird this narrative – couched in terms of either the retrieval of past socialist feminist glories or personal reinvention – we subject to critical scrutiny both their substantive claims and the conceptual scaffolding they invoke. We argue that the proleptic imaginings of all three authors, in different ways, are highly circumscribed in terms of the recommended agent, agenda and practices of progressive politics, and clouded by conceptual muddle over the meanings of ‘left’, ‘radical’ and ‘progressive’. Taken together, these problems render the conclusions of Fraser, Eisenstein and McRobbie at best unconvincing and at worst dismissive of contemporary feminist efforts to challenge neo-liberalism. We end the article by disentangling and redefining left, radical and progressive and by sketching a contrasting vision of progressive feminist politics enabled by this re-conceptualisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Eschle & Bice Maiguashca, 2014. "Reclaiming Feminist Futures: Co-opted and Progressive Politics in a Neo-liberal Age," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 62(3), pages 634-651, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:62:y:2014:i:3:p:634-651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9248.12046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chris Holligan & Robert Mclean & Adele Irvine & Carlton Brick, 2019. "Keeping It in the Family: Intersectionality and ‘Class A’ Drug Dealing by Females in the West of Scotland," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:62:y:2014:i:3:p:634-651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.