On Economic Structures and Model Solution Methods: Or Should Econometricians Use Newton Methods for Model Solution?
This paper makes the point that the choice of solution technique for nonlinear equation systems is a matter of trading the potentially smaller number of steps to convergence of formal Newton methods against the substantially smaller computational burden per step offered by simple first-order iterations such as the Gauss-Seidel method. Experiments with six typical macroeconomic models show that tradeoff to be sharply in favor of the latter. Moreover, reordering algorithms reduce all these models to near-recursive structures with relatively few feedback variables. This property is shown to be a natural consequence of the typical structure of an economic model. Copyright 1990 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 52 (1990)
Issue (Month): 3 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0305-9049Email:
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0305-9049|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:52:y:1990:i:3:p:317-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.