IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v74y2006i3p350-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Labour Market Dualism In The Lewis Model: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • RICHARD P. C. BROWN

Abstract

In a special issue of this journal commemorating the 50th anniversary of W. Arthur Lewis’s (The Manchester School, Vol. 28 (1954), No. 2, pp. 139–191) seminal paper, the Lewis model is treated as a model of labour market dualism (Fields, The Manchester School, Vol. 72 (2004), No. 6, pp. 724–735). This interpretation is flawed for a number of reasons. First, it overemphasizes the role ascribed by Lewis to intersectoral earnings differentials in his original model. Second, it fails to acknowledge that a major shortcoming of the model was its inability to account for the widening intersectoral earnings differential observed across a wide range of developing economies. For Lewis himself this was one of the ‘major theoretical puzzles of the period’ (1979, p. 150). Third, it ignores Lewis’s subsequent revision of the model (Lewis, The Manchester School, Vol. 47 (1979), No. 3, pp. 211–229) that, ironically, incorporates a dual labour market to resolve this puzzle. However, for Lewis the critical issue was dualism within the modern sector, not, as Fields understands it, labour market dualism between the modern and traditional sectors. Fields’s appreciation of the contribution of the Lewis model to understanding the process of wage determination in developing economies is therefore misplaced.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard P. C. Brown, 2006. "On Labour Market Dualism In The Lewis Model: A Comment," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 74(3), pages 350-354, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:74:y:2006:i:3:p:350-354
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00497.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00497.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00497.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Villamil & Xiaobing Wang & Yuxiang Zou, 2020. "Growth and development with dual labor markets," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(6), pages 801-826, December.
    2. Douglas Gollin, 2014. "The Lewis Model: A 60-Year Retrospective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(3), pages 71-88, Summer.
    3. Xiaobing Wang & Jenifer Piesse, 2010. "The microfoundations of dual economy models," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1010, Economics, The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:74:y:2006:i:3:p:350-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.