Author
Listed:
- Bálint Menyhért
- Szilárd Erhart
Abstract
This paper exploits exogenous shifts in work organisation during the Covid‐19 pandemic to study the implications of hybrid and remote work arrangements on occupational safety. Combining accident registers and household survey microdata from Hungary, we are able to address potential selection and reporting bias, and reliably identify the relevant mechanisms at play. Three novel findings emerge from our study. First, the pandemic had a strong positive effect on work safety: the number and equivalised incidence of work‐related accidents decreased by 16% and 11% on average. Second, these gains were unevenly distributed: workers in relatively safe occupations experienced larger reductions in accident hazards, further amplifying existing inequalities in the labour market. Third, the rapid expansion of telework was the main driver of these changes, operating mainly through compositional shifts from high‐risk traditional to low‐risk remote work arrangements within jobs. Remarkably, the safety benefits of telework did not emerge from more secure work organisation in the home but through foregone injuries typically sustained during ancillary work‐related activities such as lunch breaks, mobility routines and other errands around the workplace. Taken together, these results suggest that hybrid and remote work arrangements can be effective tools to promote occupational health and safety, though further research is needed to fully understand the broader externalities involved.
Suggested Citation
Bálint Menyhért & Szilárd Erhart, 2026.
"Home Safe Home: Safety Gains Through Telework During the Covid‐19 Pandemic,"
LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 40(2), pages 162-192, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:labour:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:162-192
DOI: 10.1111/labr.70011
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:162-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.