IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v50y2014i4p3-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of the Guanxi Institution in Skill Acquisition Between Firms: A Study of Chinese Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Shaohan Cai
  • Zhilin Yang

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="jscm12035-abs-0001"> The prevalence of personal connections in China, or guanxi, constitutes an institution that governs how people exchange favors. This study explores the effects of the guanxi institution on interfirm relational ties, information sharing, and the acquisition of skills across firms. According to social network theory, the marginal benefit of interfirm relational ties on information sharing should decrease with the strength of ties; according to information overload theory, information sharing should have an inverted U-shaped effect on the acquisition of skills. Institutional theory further suggests that the links across these three constructs are subject to the influence of the guanxi institution. With data collected from 338 manufacturing companies, this study shows that the links differ across environments that have strong versus weak guanxi institutions. A strong guanxi institution generally promotes information sharing and skill acquisition, but it also has a dark side.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaohan Cai & Zhilin Yang, 2014. "The Role of the Guanxi Institution in Skill Acquisition Between Firms: A Study of Chinese Firms," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(4), pages 3-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:50:y:2014:i:4:p:3-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jscm.2014.50.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niels J. Pulles & Raymond P.A. Loohuis, 2020. "Managing Buyer‐Supplier Conflicts: The Effect of Buyer Openness And Directness On A Supplier's Willingness to Adapt," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 65-81, October.
    2. Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2019. "Enhancing supply chain operations with extended corporate social responsibility practices by multinational enterprises: Social capital perspective from Chinese suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Shaohan Cai & Minjoon Jun & Zhilin Yang, 2017. "The Effects of Boundary Spanners’ Personal Relationships on Interfirm Collaboration and Conflict: A Study of the Role of Guanxi in China," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(3), pages 19-40, July.
    4. Cao, Qing & Baker, Jeff & Schniederjans, Dara, 2014. "Bullwhip effect reduction and improved business performance through guanxi: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 217-230.
    5. Chung-Yean Chiang & Mark Hanna & Zhenyu Liu & Xiangyu Lu, 2018. "Obtaining collaboration benefits: the role of collaboration-specific investment and absorptive capacity in China," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 69-82, December.
    6. Huo, Baofeng & Gu, Minhao & Jiang, Bin, 2018. "China-related POM research: Literature review and suggestions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 134-153.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:50:y:2014:i:4:p:3-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.