IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jrinsu/v85y2018i2p355-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direction And Intensity Of Risk Preference At The Third Order

Author

Listed:
  • Donald C. Keenan
  • Arthur Snow

Abstract

In expected utility theory, aversion to risk, greater aversion, and the desire to substitute away from risk are each characterized by properties of the Arrow–Pratt index of absolute risk aversion, with comparative statics implications for such decisions as saving. At the third order, however, no single index suffices. We contrast alternative indices of third†order risk preference and show that the substitution effect of downside risk is governed by the Schwarzian, and that where the degree of prudence governs the magnitude of precautionary saving, the Schwarzian governs the effect of background risk on the marginal rate of time preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald C. Keenan & Arthur Snow, 2018. "Direction And Intensity Of Risk Preference At The Third Order," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 85(2), pages 355-378, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:85:y:2018:i:2:p:355-378
    DOI: 10.1111/jori.12232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12232
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jori.12232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Peter, 2021. "A fresh look at primary prevention for health risks," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1247-1254, May.
    2. Donald C. Keenan & Arthur Snow, 2022. "Reversibly greater downside risk aversion," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 47(2), pages 327-338, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:85:y:2018:i:2:p:355-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ariaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.