IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v21y1972i2p185-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Uncertainties and Least Squares Regression

Author

Listed:
  • S. D. Hodges
  • P. G. Moore

Abstract

Least squares regression analysis makes the assumption that the independent variables can be measured without error. This paper examines the effect of errors in these variables and suggests some practical guidelines for the user of least squares. Related empirical and theoretical work is reviewed and simple methods are derived for assessing the sensitivity of the regression coefficients to each observation, and for calculating the approximate amount of bias in the estimated coefficients. The implications for forecasting are also examined.

Suggested Citation

  • S. D. Hodges & P. G. Moore, 1972. "Data Uncertainties and Least Squares Regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(2), pages 185-195, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:21:y:1972:i:2:p:185-195
    DOI: 10.2307/2346491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2346491
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2346491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bekker, Paul & Kapteyn, Arie & Wansbeek, Tom, 1987. "Consistent Sets of Estimates for Regressions with Correlated or Uncorrelated Measurement Errors in Arbitrary Subsets of All Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(5), pages 1223-1230, September.
    2. Mengli Zhang & Yang Bai, 2021. "On the use of repeated measurement errors in linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(5), pages 779-803, July.
    3. Bekker, P. & Kapteyn, A.J. & Wansbeek, T.J., 1984. "Measurement error and endogeneity in regression : Bounds for ML and IV-estimates," Other publications TiSEM 80b5811e-c9b0-4e05-b5fe-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Jay Magidson, 1977. "Toward a Causal Model Approach for Adjusting for Preexisting Differences in the Nonequivalent Control Group Situation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(3), pages 399-420, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:21:y:1972:i:2:p:185-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.