IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v173y2010i1p51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embedded experiments in repeated and overlapping surveys

Author

Listed:
  • James Chipperfield
  • Philip Bell

Abstract

Summary. Statistical agencies make changes to the data collection methodology of their surveys to improve the quality of the data collected or to improve the efficiency with which they are collected. For reasons of cost it may not be possible to estimate the effect of such a change on survey estimates or response rates reliably, without conducting an experiment that is embedded in the survey which involves enumerating some respondents by using the new method and some under the existing method. Embedded experiments are often designed for repeated and overlapping surveys; however, previous methods use sample data from only one occasion. The paper focuses on estimating the effect of a methodological change on estimates in the case of repeated surveys with overlapping samples from several occasions. Efficient design of an embedded experiment that covers more than one time point is also mentioned. All inference is unbiased over an assumed measurement model, the experimental design and the complex sample design. Other benefits of the approach proposed include the following: it exploits the correlation between the samples on each occasion to improve estimates of treatment effects; treatment effects are allowed to vary over time; it is robust against incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis of no treatment effect; it allows a wide set of alternative experimental designs. This paper applies the methodology proposed to the Australian Labour Force Survey to measure the effect of replacing pen‐and‐paper interviewing with computer‐assisted interviewing. This application considered alternative experimental designs in terms of their statistical efficiency and their risks to maintaining a consistent series. The approach proposed is significantly more efficient than using only 1 month of sample data in estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • James Chipperfield & Philip Bell, 2010. "Embedded experiments in repeated and overlapping surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(1), pages 51-66, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:173:y:2010:i:1:p:51-66
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00602.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00602.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00602.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan A. Van Den Brakel, 2008. "Design‐based analysis of embedded experiments with applications in the Dutch Labour Force Survey," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(3), pages 581-613, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan van den Brakel & Xichuan (Mark) Zhang & Siu‐Ming Tam, 2020. "Measuring Discontinuities in Time Series Obtained with Repeated Sample Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 155-175, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buelens Bart & Van den Brakel Jan A., 2017. "Comparing Two Inferential Approaches to Handling Measurement Error in Mixed-Mode Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(2), pages 513-531, June.
    2. Jan van den Brakel & Xichuan (Mark) Zhang & Siu‐Ming Tam, 2020. "Measuring Discontinuities in Time Series Obtained with Repeated Sample Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 155-175, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:173:y:2010:i:1:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.