IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v63y2026i6p3249-3277.html

Clash of the Titans: Conflict Intensity, Community Dependence on Environmental Resources, and Stakeholder Multiplicity

Author

Listed:
  • Chang Hoon Oh
  • Jiyoung Shin

Abstract

Extending the stakeholder multiplicity perspective and resource dependence theory, this study investigates how the dependency of both a company and a community on environmental resources for livelihoods influences the conflict intensity between them. We theorize that companies face difficulties in managing key stakeholders when these stakeholders heavily rely on environmental resources for their livelihoods. We also argue that their conflicted relationship depends on surrounding stakeholders' involvements. This study highlights that stakeholder multiplicity shapes the dynamics in stakeholder salience (competing or cooperating), which in turn affects companies' approach toward them. The study analyses 318 global mining conflicts spanning from 2002 to 2013 using a hand‐collected, multi‐source dataset. Empirical findings reveal that local communities' dependence on environmental resources increases the intensity of conflicts between mining companies and communities. The positive effect of communities' resource dependence on conflict intensity is weakened by the involvement of environment‐oriented (vis‐a‐vis growth‐oriented) government actors. In contrast, the lack of support from broader society (societal inequality) strengthens this effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang Hoon Oh & Jiyoung Shin, 2026. "Clash of the Titans: Conflict Intensity, Community Dependence on Environmental Resources, and Stakeholder Multiplicity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(6), pages 3249-3277, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:6:p:3249-3277
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:6:p:3249-3277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.