IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v63y2026i6p3063-3096.html

Coworker Support Exceeding Expectations as a Double‐Edged Sword: The Role of Workplace Status

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Ni
  • Lynda Jiwen Song
  • Xiaoming Zheng

Abstract

Most prior research has assumed that employees always appreciate coworker support. However, coworker support exceeding expectations can be considered a double‐edged sword in the workplace. Drawing on expectation violation theory, this research explores when and how coworker support exceeding expectations becomes a positive or negative expectation violation that influences employees' interpersonal behaviour. We propose that when employees have a lower level of workplace status, coworker support exceeding their expectations is more likely to be a positive expectation violation and, therefore, will be positively related to employee gratitude and interpersonal citizenship behaviour. In contrast, when employees have a higher level of workplace status, coworker support exceeding expectations tends to be a negative expectation violation and, in turn, is positively related to employee shame and interpersonal counterproductive work behaviour. Two multiwave field surveys with Chinese employees and two scenario‐based experiments with Western workers largely support our hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Ni & Lynda Jiwen Song & Xiaoming Zheng, 2026. "Coworker Support Exceeding Expectations as a Double‐Edged Sword: The Role of Workplace Status," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(6), pages 3063-3096, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:6:p:3063-3096
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:6:p:3063-3096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.