IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v63y2026i3p930-960.html

A More Ethical Workplace? How and Why Perceived Socially Responsible Human Resource Management Makes a Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Nhat Tan Pham
  • Jintao Lu
  • Chidiebere Ogbonnaya
  • Tran Hoang Tuan
  • William Y. Degbey
  • Benjamin Laker

Abstract

Socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) is a critical component of an organization's corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy. It focuses on promoting sustainability goals and creating a positive social environment for employees to observe, learn, and internalize the organization's ethical values. Drawing on social learning theory, we conducted two separate field studies to investigate the direct and indirect links between employee perceptions of SRHRM practices and ethical workplace behaviour, as well as the moderating role of supervisor ethical leadership. In Study 1, we analysed three‐wave data from 243 employees in Taiwanese organizations. The results show that perceived SRHRM practices shape ethical workplace behaviour both directly and indirectly through cognitive (value commitment) and morality‐based (moral ownership) mechanisms. Study 2 validates these findings using time‐lagged data from 302 employee–supervisor dyads in Vietnamese organizations. Additionally, this study reveals that the indirect positive relationship between perceived SRHRM and ethical behaviour is stronger when supervisors adopt an ethical leadership style. These findings offer a crucial Asia‐Pacific perspective, complementing the predominantly Western‐focused views on social responsibility in HRM and CSR research.

Suggested Citation

  • Nhat Tan Pham & Jintao Lu & Chidiebere Ogbonnaya & Tran Hoang Tuan & William Y. Degbey & Benjamin Laker, 2026. "A More Ethical Workplace? How and Why Perceived Socially Responsible Human Resource Management Makes a Difference," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 930-960, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:3:p:930-960
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:3:p:930-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.