IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v63y2026i2p761-807.html

Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism

Author

Listed:
  • Laavanya Ramaul
  • Paavo Ritala
  • Angelos Kostis
  • Päivi Aaltonen

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has long held the promise of imitating, replacing, or even surpassing human intelligence. Now that the abilities of AI systems have started to approach this initial aspiration, organization and management scholars face a challenge in how to theorize this technology, which potentially changes the way we view technology: not as a tool, but as something that enters previously human‐only domains. To navigate this theorizing challenge, we adopt the problematizing review method by engaging in a selective and critical reading of the theoretical contributions regarding AI, in the most influential organization and management journals. We examine how the literature has grounded itself with AI as the root metaphor and what field assumptions about AI are shared – or contested – in the field. We uncover two core assumptions of rationality and anthropomorphism, around which fruitful debates are already emerging. We discuss these two assumptions and their organizational boundary conditions in the context of theorizing AI. Finally, we invite scholars to build distinctive organization and management theory scaffolding within the broader social science of AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Laavanya Ramaul & Paavo Ritala & Angelos Kostis & Päivi Aaltonen, 2026. "Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 761-807, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:2:p:761-807
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13246
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:2:p:761-807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.