IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v63y2026i2p722-760.html

The Dark Side of Managing Human–AI Collaborations: Implications for Leaders’ Moral Relativism and Unethical Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Guohua He
  • Dan Ni
  • Puchu Zhao
  • Xin Qin

Abstract

As collaborations between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) have become increasingly prevalent across various industries, the role of leaders in managing these collaborations has grown in importance. While the existing literature has highlighted the benefits of leader management in these settings – emphasizing the complementary strengths of humans and AI – the potential costs to key stakeholders, particularly to leaders themselves, have been largely ignored. This research addresses this gap by drawing on moral relativism theory to develop and test a model explaining how leader management of human–AI collaborations may induce leaders’ moral relativism and, in turn, result in unethical behaviour at work. Furthermore, we identify leaders’ need for cognitive closure as a crucial individual difference that negatively moderates these effects. Findings from a critical‐incident experiment, two scenario‐based experiments, and one field survey conducted with samples from both Western and Eastern cultures (i.e., the United States and China) support our model.

Suggested Citation

  • Guohua He & Dan Ni & Puchu Zhao & Xin Qin, 2026. "The Dark Side of Managing Human–AI Collaborations: Implications for Leaders’ Moral Relativism and Unethical Behaviour," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 722-760, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:2:p:722-760
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:2:p:722-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.