IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v63y2026i2p631-667.html

Examining the Effect of a Firm’s AI Specialization on the Technology Firms it Acquires: A Real Options Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Hon Li
  • Steven Boivie
  • Gerry McNamara
  • Pok Man Tang

Abstract

The digital revolution is transforming global business practices. As organizations increasingly embed artificial intelligence (AI) within their operations, they face unprecedented uncertainty regarding future technological trajectories and competitive landscapes. To maintain competitiveness in the emerging technological space, they need to promptly acquire advanced knowledge to enrich their technological portfolio. Drawing on real options theory (ROT), our study integrates AI‐based acquisitions with internal AI development. We posit that a firm’s AI specialization represents the accumulation of critical technological knowledge and creates a portfolio of strategic options. These options can subsequently be exercised as AI acquisitions to secure complementary external capabilities. Moreover, the efficacy of these options is contingent on distinct uncertainties, including technical, modal, and complementarity uncertainties, captured by target R&D intensity, target self‐fluidity, and product market overlap, respectively. Using a sample of US public firms that carried out acquisitions from 2004 to 2015, we find support for our hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Hon Li & Steven Boivie & Gerry McNamara & Pok Man Tang, 2026. "Examining the Effect of a Firm’s AI Specialization on the Technology Firms it Acquires: A Real Options Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 631-667, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:2:p:631-667
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.70012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.70012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:63:y:2026:i:2:p:631-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.