IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v62y2025i8p3575-3595.html

Transforming How Ambivalence About DEI Work is Managed in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie J. Creary

Abstract

Although debates around diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) work might suggest a polarized population, many people feel ambivalent or hold mixed positive and negative feelings about such work. While ambivalence can be beneficial or harmful, scholars have overlooked the idea that bringing ambivalence about DEI work into conscious awareness may help to transform it from a potentially harmful emotion into a constructive one. In this paper, I conceptualize a ‘vicious system’ in which ambivalence about DEI work is unconsciously suppressed and contrast it with a ‘virtuous system’ where ambivalence about DEI work is consciously acknowledged and embraced. The model highlights three key forms of emotional work necessary for shifting from a vicious to virtuous system: discursive work, relational work and organizational body work. Ultimately, this paper advances theory in DEI, social‐symbolic work and organizational ambivalence by demonstrating how engaging with ambivalence about DEI work can lead to more constructive outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie J. Creary, 2025. "Transforming How Ambivalence About DEI Work is Managed in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(8), pages 3575-3595, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:8:p:3575-3595
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:8:p:3575-3595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.