IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v62y2025i7p3005-3043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Through the Lens of Fairness: A Qualitative Investigation into Co‐workers’ Perceptions of I‐deals

Author

Listed:
  • Sona Gachayeva
  • Susan Murphy
  • Maryam Aldossari

Abstract

Amidst the rapidly evolving work environment that increasingly necessitates personalized approaches towards employees, there is a pressing need to broaden our understanding of idiosyncratic deals (i‐deals) and their third‐party implications in the workplace. Although immediate responses to i‐deals often hinge on equity and social comparison, this approach does not fully explain co‐workers’ perceptions of others’ i‐deals. By reconciling various theoretical accounts, we propose that co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals largely depend on the implementation of i‐deals and related justice perceptions of co‐workers. However, our understanding of how i‐deal implementation shapes co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals from a justice perspective remains limited. Therefore, we conducted an inductive multiple‐case study through 48 in‐depth interviews involving managers, i‐deal receivers (i‐dealers), and co‐workers. Building on our findings, we develop an emergent framework that explains how the implementation of i‐deals, when viewed through the lens of organizational justice, can shape co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals. This novel perspective enriches the i‐deal literature by offering a fresh angle on the third‐party implications of i‐deals, emphasizing the significance of their implementation and related fairness perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sona Gachayeva & Susan Murphy & Maryam Aldossari, 2025. "Through the Lens of Fairness: A Qualitative Investigation into Co‐workers’ Perceptions of I‐deals," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(7), pages 3005-3043, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:7:p:3005-3043
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13151
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:7:p:3005-3043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.