IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v62y2025i5p1885-1913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Harry Scarbrough
  • Yaru Chen
  • Gerardo Patriotta

Abstract

New technologies are equivocal, triggering sensemaking responses from the individuals who encounter them. As an ‘epistemic technology’ AI poses new challenges to the expertise and jurisdictions of professionals. Such challenges may be interpreted quite differently, however, depending on the specialized role identities which develop within the wider professional domain. We explore the sensemaking responses of these intra‐professional groupings to the challenges posed by AI through an empirical study of professionals playing different roles (front‐line, hybrid and field‐level) in the field of radiology within NHS England. We found that these intra‐professional groupings sought to make sense of AI through a triadic view focused on the interplay of professional, client and technology. This sensemaking, arising from different jurisdictional contexts, led individual professionals to perceive that their agency was diminished, complemented or enhanced as a result of the introduction of AI. Our findings contribute to the literature on professions and AI by showing how intra‐professional differences affect sensemaking responses to AI as a jurisdictional contestant.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry Scarbrough & Yaru Chen & Gerardo Patriotta, 2025. "The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1885-1913, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:5:p:1885-1913
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:5:p:1885-1913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.