IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v62y2025i4p1379-1409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Does a Firm Fail to Walk the Talk? Decoupling in International Expansion

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Xu
  • Wei Shi
  • Jing Zhao
  • Xuanyu Chen

Abstract

Neo‐institutional theory predicts that when adaptations to institutional pressures contradict a firm's efficiency needs, decoupling may arise. This study systematically investigates the drivers of heterogeneous decoupling in the context of international expansion. We propose that specific configurations – awareness of peers’ decoupling, a strong motivation to obtain legitimacy through ceremonial conformity, and a weak capability to couple stated policies with practices – will lead to a high occurrence of decoupling. An empirical analysis of 8918 annual reports of 1974 Chinese‐listed companies from the period 2013–17 suggests that the ‘Go Global’ initiative undertaken by the Chinese government has created high institutional pressure for all Chinese firms to expand globally. However, when the implementation of that move is perceived as too costly or risky for a firm, the firm is likely to choose to decouple its international expansion from its stated commitment to expand under certain configurations of awareness, motivation, and capability conditions. Our theory and empirical findings extend decoupling research and international business research by providing a holistic configurational analysis of firms’ decoupling in an international expansion context.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Xu & Wei Shi & Jing Zhao & Xuanyu Chen, 2025. "When Does a Firm Fail to Walk the Talk? Decoupling in International Expansion," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1379-1409, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:4:p:1379-1409
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:4:p:1379-1409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.