IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v12y1975i3p276-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Analyses Of Management Salary Differentials

Author

Listed:
  • T. M. Husband

Abstract

This paper reviews the practical value of a number of quantitative models of management pay structures at the level of the firm. The aim is to identify the practical, operational value of these models to salary administrators. Models developed in the last twenty years by Roberts (1956), Peason (1967), Simon (1957), Lydall (1959), Thorelli (1965) and Paterson (1972) are reviewed and their practical weaknesses highlighted. It is concluded that models of this nature are of considerable conceptual value in relating some of the economic and organizational factors involved in management pay. Most quantitative models appear to have mainly academic value. However, the paper demonstrates how an approach using a mixed Pearson and Paterson model can be applied in a practical fashion to yield useful salary administration guidelines. The Pearson model is based on a Pareto distribution of managerial salaries within the firm, while Paterson's model provides definitions of authority levels associated with management jobs. The combined Pearson/Paterson approach provides the administrator with a helpful framework which allows comparison of his firm's salary structure with those of companies in similar industries as well as measurement of changes within his salary structure over a selected time period.

Suggested Citation

  • T. M. Husband, 1975. "Quantitative Analyses Of Management Salary Differentials," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 276-289, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:12:y:1975:i:3:p:276-289
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00512.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00512.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00512.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:12:y:1975:i:3:p:276-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.