IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i8p1028-1038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes an idea worth spreading? Language markers of popularity in TED talks by academics and other speakers

Author

Listed:
  • Kate MacKrill
  • Connor Silvester
  • James W. Pennebaker
  • Keith J. Petrie

Abstract

TED talks are a popular internet forum where new ideas and research are presented by a wide variety of speakers. In this study, we investigated how the language used in TED talks influenced popularity and viewer ratings. We also investigated the differences in linguistic style and ratings of talks given by academics and non‐academics. The transcripts of 1866 talks were analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program and eight language variables were correlated with number of views and viewer ratings. We found that talks with more analytic language received fewer views, while a greater use of the pronoun “I,” positive emotion and social words was associated with more views. Talks with these linguistic characteristics received more emotional viewer ratings such as inspiring or courageous. When comparing talks by academics and non‐academics, there was no difference in the overall popularity but viewers rated talks by academics as more fascinating, informative, and persuasive while non‐academics received higher emotional ratings. The implications for understanding social influence processes are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate MacKrill & Connor Silvester & James W. Pennebaker & Keith J. Petrie, 2021. "What makes an idea worth spreading? Language markers of popularity in TED talks by academics and other speakers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 1028-1038, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:8:p:1028-1038
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diorge P. Souza & Gabriel U. Oka & Cristina E. Alvarez-Martinez & Alexandre W. Bisson-Filho & German Dunger & Lise Hobeika & Nayara S. Cavalcante & Marcos C. Alegria & Leandro R.S. Barbosa & Roberto K, 2015. "Bacterial killing via a type IV secretion system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Xiao-chen Bai & Chuangye Yan & Guanghui Yang & Peilong Lu & Dan Ma & Linfeng Sun & Rui Zhou & Sjors H. W. Scheres & Yigong Shi, 2015. "An atomic structure of human γ-secretase," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7568), pages 212-217, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivia Fischer & Loris T. Jeitziner & Dirk U. Wulff, 2024. "Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Himani Amin & Aravindan Ilangovan & Tiago R. D. Costa, 2021. "Architecture of the outer-membrane core complex from a conjugative type IV secretion system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:8:p:1028-1038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.