IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v69y2018i10p1223-1233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

If these crawls could talk: Studying and documenting web archives provenance

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Maemura
  • Nicholas Worby
  • Ian Milligan
  • Christoph Becker

Abstract

The increasing use and prominence of web archives raises the urgency of establishing mechanisms for transparency in the making of web archives to facilitate the process of evaluating a web archive's provenance, scoping, and absences. Some choices and process events are captured automatically, but their interactions are not currently well understood or documented. This study examined the decision space of web archives and its role in shaping what is and what is not captured in the web archiving process. By comparing how three different web archives collections were created and documented, we investigate how curatorial decisions interact with technical and external factors and we compare commonalities and differences. The findings reveal the need to understand both the social and technical context that shapes those decisions and the ways in which these individual decisions interact. Based on the study, we propose a framework for documenting key dimensions of a collection that addresses the situated nature of the organizational context, technical specificities, and unique characteristics of web materials that are the focus of a collection. The framework enables future researchers to undertake empirical work studying the process of creating web archives collections in different contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Maemura & Nicholas Worby & Ian Milligan & Christoph Becker, 2018. "If these crawls could talk: Studying and documenting web archives provenance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(10), pages 1223-1233, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:69:y:2018:i:10:p:1223-1233
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:69:y:2018:i:10:p:1223-1233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.