IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v34y2025i3p674-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimism and Overconfidence of Strategic Decision Makers‐Comparing Entrepreneurs and Managers With Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Nadine Chochoiek
  • Laura Rosendahl Huber
  • Randolph Sloof

Abstract

Empirical evidence supports the conventional wisdom that entrepreneurs are more optimistic and overconfident than others. However, the same holds true for (top) managers. In a large incentivized survey ( n = 2404 n \unicode{x0003D} 2404 ), we directly compare entrepreneurs, managers, and employees on a comprehensive set of measures of optimism and overconfidence. We find that on average entrepreneurs and managers are more optimistic than employees in their dispositional optimism and their explanatory style of past events. However, they do not differ from each other in these respects. For two incentivized measures of overconfidence, we also find no differences between entrepreneurs and managers. Both are equally likely to overestimate their own abilities compared to employees. In terms of overestimating general economic prospects differences with employees are much less pronounced. Exploration of within‐group heterogeneities shows that these observations hold true for various subgroups of entrepreneurs and managers. Together these findings tentatively suggest that optimism and overconfidence characterize strategic decision makers more generally, irrespective of whether they bear the full risk of their strategic decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadine Chochoiek & Laura Rosendahl Huber & Randolph Sloof, 2025. "Optimism and Overconfidence of Strategic Decision Makers‐Comparing Entrepreneurs and Managers With Employees," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 674-695, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:674-695
    DOI: 10.1111/jems.12615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12615
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jems.12615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:674-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.