IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v37y2023i3p993-1032.html

CSR and firm profitability: Evidence from a meta‐regression analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Hirsch
  • Thies Petersen
  • Maximilian Koppenberg
  • Monika Hartmann

Abstract

We analyze the literature on the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) by applying meta‐regression analysis (MRA) to 7800 results of 512 empirical studies. Our findings reveal a small positive link between CSP and CFP as well as the presence of publication bias that favors statistically significant CSP–CFP regression coefficients. We also evaluate the impact of the underlying research design on the heterogeneity in published effects using Bayesian and frequentist model‐averaging (FMA). We consider 42 contextual characteristics and our results show that reported CSP–CFP effects are smaller in cases where a binary index is used to measure CSP or when CSP is used as the dependent variable. In contrast, firms in industrial sectors or operating in China rather than the United States exhibit stronger effects. Finally, the CSP–CFP effect is driven by the choice of the econometric estimator and the inclusion of firm size as control variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Hirsch & Thies Petersen & Maximilian Koppenberg & Monika Hartmann, 2023. "CSR and firm profitability: Evidence from a meta‐regression analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 993-1032, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:37:y:2023:i:3:p:993-1032
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12523
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:37:y:2023:i:3:p:993-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.