IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v33y2019i2p689-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Many Instruments And/Or Regressors: A Friendly Guide

Author

Listed:
  • Stanislav Anatolyev

Abstract

This paper surveys the state of the art in the econometrics of regression models with many instruments or many regressors based on alternative – namely, dimension – asymptotics. We list critical results of dimension asymptotics that lead to better approximations of properties of familiar and alternative estimators and tests when the instruments and/or regressors are numerous. Then, we consider the problem of estimation and inference in the basic linear instrumental variables regression setup with many strong instruments. We describe the failures of conventional estimation and inference, as well as alternative tools that restore consistency and validity. We then add various other features to the basic model such as heteroskedasticity, instrument weakness, etc., in each case providing a review of the existing tools for proper estimation and inference. Subsequently, we consider a related but different problem of estimation and testing in a linear mean regression with many regressors. We also describe various extensions and connections to other settings, such as panel data models, spatial models, time series models, and so on. Finally, we provide practical guidance regarding which tools are most suitable to use in various situations when many instruments and/or regressors turn out to be an issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanislav Anatolyev, 2019. "Many Instruments And/Or Regressors: A Friendly Guide," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 689-726, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:689-726
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abhimanyu Gupta & Myung Hwan Seo, 2023. "Robust Inference on Infinite and Growing Dimensional Time‐Series Regression," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(4), pages 1333-1361, July.
    2. Mayer, Alexander, 2022. "On the local power of some tests of strict exogeneity in linear fixed effects models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 49-74.
    3. Anatolyev, Stanislav & Sølvsten, Mikkel, 2023. "Testing many restrictions under heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 236(1).
    4. Wang, Wenjie, 2022. "Wild bootstrap test of overidentification with many instruments and heteroskedasticity," MPRA Paper 115168, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kuanhao Jiang & Rajarshi Mukherjee & Subhabrata Sen & Pragya Sur, 2022. "A New Central Limit Theorem for the Augmented IPW Estimator: Variance Inflation, Cross-Fit Covariance and Beyond," Papers 2205.10198, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    6. Mayer, Alexander, 2020. "(Consistently) testing strict exogeneity against the alternative of predeterminedness in linear time-series models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Johannes W. Ligtenberg, 2023. "Inference in IV models with clustered dependence, many instruments and weak identification," Papers 2306.08559, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    8. Xuexin WANG, 2021. "Instrumental variable estimation via a continuum of instruments with an application to estimating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution in consumption," Working Papers 2021-11-06, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    9. Anna Mikusheva & Mikkel S{o}lvsten, 2023. "Linear Regression with Weak Exogeneity," Papers 2308.08958, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    10. Wang, Wenjie, 2020. "On Bootstrap Validity for the Test of Overidentifying Restrictions with Many Instruments and Heteroskedasticity," MPRA Paper 104858, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:689-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.