IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v60y2022i2p463-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Governance of Europe's Transnational Party System Contributing to EU Democracy?

Author

Listed:
  • Ludvig Norman
  • Wouter Wolfs

Abstract

Does Europe's transnational party system contribute to EU democracy? Existing debates on this issue have conventionally revolved around conflicting assumptions on the feasibility of supranational democracy in general, rather than examining the party system's structure as it is set up and regulated. In this paper we evaluate to what extent the transnational party system contributes to the democratic qualities of the EU by studying the regulatory framework for European political parties. We establish an analytical framework based on studies of party system governance, and focus on two specific characteristics: the contestability of the Europarty system and the extent to which it promotes citizen participation in European political parties. Our analysis demonstrates that the governance structure impedes rather than bolsters the democratic potential of Europarties, since the rules work to prevent new parties from entering the party system, and fail to provide incentives for a more active political participation of European citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludvig Norman & Wouter Wolfs, 2022. "Is the Governance of Europe's Transnational Party System Contributing to EU Democracy?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 463-479, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:2:p:463-479
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saitto, Francesco, 2017. "European political parties and European public space from the Maastricht Treaty to the Reg. No. 1141/2014," Discussion Papers 2/17, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    2. Klüver, Heike & Rodon, Toni, 2013. "Explaining Policy Position Choice of Europarties: The Effect of Legislative Resources," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 629-650, July.
    3. Van Biezen, Ingrid, 2008. "State Intervention in Party Politics: The Public Funding and Regulation of Political Parties," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 337-353, July.
    4. Christian Breuer & Matthias Müller, 2010. "Government Debt in Europe," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 11(02), pages 111-112, July.
    5. Ludvig Norman, 2021. "To Democratize or to Protect? How the Response to Anti‐System Parties Reshapes the EU's Transnational Party System," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 721-737, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Camatarri & Francesco Zucchini, 2019. "Government coalitions and Eurosceptic voting in the 2014 European Parliament elections," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 425-446, September.
    2. Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen & Andreja Pegan, 2023. "Blurred lines between electoral and parliamentary representation: The use of constituency staff among Members of the European Parliament," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 239-263, June.
    3. Denise Carolin Hübner, 2016. "The ‘National Decisions’ database (Dec.Nat): Introducing a database on national courts’ interactions with European Law," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(2), pages 324-339, June.
    4. James S Fishkin & Robert C Luskin & Alice Siu, 2014. "Europolis and the European public sphere: Empirical explorations of a counterfactual ideal," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(3), pages 328-351, September.
    5. Nicole Bolleyer & Valeria Smirnova & Fabrizio Di Mascio & Alessandro Natalini, 2020. "Conflict of interest regulation in European parliaments: Studying the evolution of complex regulatory regimes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 428-446, July.
    6. Nicolo' Conti & Bruno Marino & Vincenzo Memoli, 2021. "Business Elites and European Integration: Really a Honeymoon Story?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1400-1418, November.
    7. Hermann Schmitt & Sara Hobolt & Sebastian Adrian Popa, 2015. "Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 347-368, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:2:p:463-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.