IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v16y1989i3p443-448.html

Paradoxes In the Cost Allocation For Joint Products

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Moon

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Moon, 1989. "Paradoxes In the Cost Allocation For Joint Products," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 443-448, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:16:y:1989:i:3:p:443-448
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1989.tb00029.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1989.tb00029.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1989.tb00029.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunder, S, 1983. "Simpson Reversal Paradox And Cost Allocation," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 222-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hennessy, David A. & Feng, Hongli, 2009. "A Paradox for Agro-Environmental Land Policy," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 53934, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    2. Mingcherng Deng & Nahum Melumad & Toshi Shibano, 2012. "Auditors’ Liability, Investments, and Capital Markets: A Potential Unintended Consequence of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 50(5), pages 1179-1215, December.
    3. Nahum D. Melumad & Amir Ziv, 2004. "Reduced Quality and an Unlevel Playing Field Could Make Consumers Happier," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12), pages 1646-1659, December.
    4. Abraham Mehrez & J. Randall Brown & Moutaz Khouja, 1992. "Aggregate efficiency measures and Simpson's Paradox," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 329-342, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:16:y:1989:i:3:p:443-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.