IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v61y2010i4p787-801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus “digital humanities” as a topic

Author

Listed:
  • Loet Leydesdorff
  • Alkim Almila Akdag Salah

Abstract

The possibilities of using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) for journal mapping have not been sufficiently recognized because of the absence of a Journal Citations Report (JCR) for this database. A quasi‐JCR for the A&HCI (2008) was constructed from the data contained in the Web of Science and is used for the evaluation of two journals as examples: Leonardo and Art Journal. The maps on the basis of the aggregated journal–journal citations within this domain can be compared with maps including references to journals in the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index. Art journals are cited by (social) science journals more than by other art journals, but these journals draw upon one another in terms of their own references. This cultural impact in terms of being cited is not found when documents with a topic such as “digital humanities” are analyzed. This community of practice functions more as an intellectual organizer than a journal.

Suggested Citation

  • Loet Leydesdorff & Alkim Almila Akdag Salah, 2010. "Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus “digital humanities” as a topic," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(4), pages 787-801, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:4:p:787-801
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Ferrara & Andrea Bonaccorsi, 2016. "How robust is journal rating in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a large-scale, multi-method exercise," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 279-291.
    2. Björn Hammarfelt, 2011. "Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 705-725, March.
    3. Muh-Chyun Tang & Yun Jen Cheng & Kuang Hua Chen, 2017. "A longitudinal study of intellectual cohesion in digital humanities using bibliometric analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 985-1008, November.
    4. Per Ahlgren & Peter Pagin & Olle Persson & Maria Svedberg, 2015. "Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: free will and sorites," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 47-73, April.
    5. Giovanni Colavizza, 2017. "The structural role of the core literature in history," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1787-1809, December.
    6. Aparna Basu & Roland Wagner Dobler, 2012. "‘Cognitive mobility’ or migration of authors between fields used in mapping a network of mathematics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 353-368, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:4:p:787-801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.