IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v77y2026i2p786-802.html

Environmental Information or Social Norm? A Ladder Toward Environmentally Sustainable Food Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Ryosuke Inoue
  • Kentaro Kawasaki

Abstract

Agricultural production and the food supply chain have a significant impact on the environment. To foster an environmentally sustainable food system, it is vital to change consumers' food choice patterns to be more environmentally sustainable. This study presents a concept ladder, a simplified model under which consumers may be at different stages in terms of their willingness and ability to make environmentally sustainable food choices: some may have little concern, others may have more concern but require the impetus of broader social norms to modify their choices, while a final group may have strong concern but in some cases be unable to exercise their preferences because of financial or other constraints. To empirically test this concept, we conducted a large‐scale randomised experiment involving Japanese consumers through two online surveys. In the first survey, respondents were randomly separated into three groups and provided with either environmental issue information (T1), social norm information (T2) or no information (Control). Two weeks later, a follow‐up survey was conducted to compare the actual environmental sustainability of food choice behaviours among the groups. The results show that the treatment effect of T1 is the largest for those with a low level of environmental concern, while the treatment effect of T2 is the largest for those with a moderate level of environmental concern, consistent with the ladder concept. Several robustness checks support these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryosuke Inoue & Kentaro Kawasaki, 2026. "Environmental Information or Social Norm? A Ladder Toward Environmentally Sustainable Food Choices," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 786-802, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:77:y:2026:i:2:p:786-802
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.70043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-9552.70043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:77:y:2026:i:2:p:786-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.