IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v70y2019i2p275-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Distortions to Agricultural Incentives for Value Chain Analysis: Evidence from Indian Value Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Simla Tokgoz
  • Fahd Majeed

Abstract

We extend the nominal rate of protection (NRP) methodology to a value chain framework. We develop our methodology for three types of value chains: a new value chain created by policy, a value chain in which a by‐product is created in the processing of a commodity, and a value chain in which processing of a commodity generates new product(s). We consider two cases of value chains: when the commodity is tradable and when it is non‐tradable. The proposed indicator, value chain NRP, allows policy‐makers to see an aggregate measure of all policy impacts on all the commodities and products in the value chain, normalised at the farm level. We apply the methodology to selected value chains in India. Our results indicate that farmers are subsidised, but at different rates. Both sugarcane producers and sugar producers are protected, but sugar producers are protected at higher rates. Producers of downstream products such as ethanol and molasses are taxed, whereas the crushing industry is subsidised. We observe that there is increasing protection along the value chain from commodity to product for the oilseeds sector, whereas the picture is less clear for the sugarcane value chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Simla Tokgoz & Fahd Majeed, 2019. "Measuring Distortions to Agricultural Incentives for Value Chain Analysis: Evidence from Indian Value Chains," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 275-292, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:70:y:2019:i:2:p:275-292
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12305
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-9552.12305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:70:y:2019:i:2:p:275-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.