IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v65y2014i2p420-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sealed-bid Double Auction Experiment on German Milk Quota Exchanges

Author

Listed:
  • Jens-Peter Loy
  • Thomas Glauben
  • Till Requate
  • Christoph R. Weiss

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="jage12050-abs-0001"> Standard double auctions perfectly mimic the neoclassical idea about the functioning of markets. The efficiency of the market outcome and speed of adjustment towards equilibrium have been studied in the literature to validate economic expectations. However, only a few real world examples outside the financial sector exist. In 2000, Germany implemented a sealed-bid double auction mechanism for trading milk quota. The two main features of this mechanism are: (1) a sealed-bid double auction that produces excess demands that are covered by state reserves free of charge, and (2) a variable price band that is used to exclude price bids above a certain range. To study these regulations a sealed-bid double auction experiment is simulated and run with students. It is shown that the regulations lead to significant losses in welfare that are caused by direct effects and by an imperfect adjustment of individual bidding behaviour. Further, learning effects throughout the experiments appear to be very limited. Thus, complex auction mechanisms may need to be thoroughly tested before being introduced in the real world.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens-Peter Loy & Thomas Glauben & Till Requate & Christoph R. Weiss, 2014. "A Sealed-bid Double Auction Experiment on German Milk Quota Exchanges," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 420-445, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:65:y:2014:i:2:p:420-445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jage.2014.65.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:65:y:2014:i:2:p:420-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.