IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intlab/v163y2024i2p225-245.html

What about us? A vignette study explaining training preferences by contract type and skill specificity

Author

Listed:
  • Ferry KOSTER

Abstract

This article presents a vignette experiment conducted in the Netherlands to study workers’ training preferences. Human capital theory, signalling theory and insights from the “new employment relationship” inform the hypothesis that training preferences depend on the specificity of the skills targeted by training in combination with employment contract type. The results confirm this hypothesis and indicate that, although workers on open‐ended contracts have a stronger relative preference for organization‐specific skills than temporary workers ‐ who have a stronger relative preference for general skills ‐ all workers prefer training aimed at general over organization‐specific skills. Workers on temporary contracts are moreover found to receive less training in practice than they would like.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferry KOSTER, 2024. "What about us? A vignette study explaining training preferences by contract type and skill specificity," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 163(2), pages 225-245, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:163:y:2024:i:2:p:225-245
    DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ilr.12414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:163:y:2024:i:2:p:225-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.