IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intfin/v28y2025i2p115-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Central Bank Credibility Improve Monetary Policy? A Meta‐Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Cepeda
  • Bibiana Taboada
  • Mauricio Villamizar‐Villegas

Abstract

We bring together the largest meta‐analysis ever conducted in the macroeconomic literature to investigate the effects of central bank credibility on monetary policy. With nearly 1200 surveyed effects, we first confirm that (i) conventional policy significantly affects inflation and output, and (ii) unconventional policy significantly affects capital flows and the exchange rate. We next evaluate whether different measures of credibility amplify these effects. Our findings indicate that central bank transparency has the largest payoff, as it increases policy effectiveness by 69% when dealing with foreign exchange intervention, by 59% when dealing with capital inflows, and by 14% when dealing with conventional policy. An alternative credibility measure, medium and long‐term anchoring in inflation expectations, is the runner‐up, increasing effectiveness by 31%, 9% and 10%, respectively. Other measures, such as central bank independence and short‐term anchoring in inflation expectations, have lower and in some cases null incremental effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Cepeda & Bibiana Taboada & Mauricio Villamizar‐Villegas, 2025. "Can Central Bank Credibility Improve Monetary Policy? A Meta‐Analysis," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 115-140, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:intfin:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:115-140
    DOI: 10.1111/infi.70000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/infi.70000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intfin:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:115-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1367-0271 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.