IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v23y2019i4p744-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational Perspectives on Extended Producer Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Atalay Atasu

Abstract

We revisit three important assumptions about extended producer responsibility (EPR) that originate from academia, policy, or practice: (1) A central objective of EPR should be to induce product designs for the environment; (2) collective EPR implementations mute incentives to design for the environment; and (3) more stringent EPR policy parameters will generate better environmental outcomes. We discuss the potential shortcomings of these assumptions from an operations perspective and their implications for academic and policy research.

Suggested Citation

  • Atalay Atasu, 2019. "Operational Perspectives on Extended Producer Responsibility," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(4), pages 744-750, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:23:y:2019:i:4:p:744-750
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12816
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakob T. Pruess, 2023. "Unraveling the complexity of extended producer responsibility policy mix design, implementation, and transfer dynamics in the European Union," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1500-1520, December.
    2. Compagnoni, Marco & Grazzi, Marco & Pieri, Fabio & Tomasi, Chiara, 2023. "Extended producer responsibility and trade flows in waste: The case of batteries," FEEM Working Papers 338789, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    3. Leticia Antunes Nogueira & Louise Brøns Kringelum & Julia Olsen & Finn Arne Jørgensen & Bjørn Vidar Vangelsten, 2022. "What would it take to establish a take‐back scheme for fishing gear? Insights from a comparative analysis of fishing gear and beverage containers," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2020-2032, December.
    4. Atalay Atasu & Charles J. Corbett & Ximin (Natalie) Huang & L. Beril Toktay, 2020. "Sustainable Operations Management Through the Perspective of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 146-157, January.
    5. Kieran Campbell‐Johnston & Maurits de Munck & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Chris Backes, 2021. "Future perspectives on the role of extended producer responsibility within a circular economy: A Delphi study using the case of the Netherlands," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4054-4067, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:23:y:2019:i:4:p:744-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.