IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i6p431-446.html

Equal Access, Unequal Investment: Gender Differences in Workplace Training Intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Bonwoo Koo
  • Jangho Yang
  • Brian Cozzarin

Abstract

Gender differences in access to workplace training have narrowed in many countries, and training participation rates are commonly used to assess equality in skill development. However, participation rates alone do not capture how much training employees receive. Using linked employer–employee data covering 779 Korean manufacturing firms between 2007 and 2023, this study examines gender differences in the intensity of employer‐provided training. We find that, conditional on firm, year, and worker characteristics, female employees who participate in training receive approximately 12% fewer training days than comparable male employees within the same firm. This disparity remains stable over time and is robust to alternative specifications and estimators. The participation gap is most pronounced in mentoring programs, while the intensity gap is largest among sales and service occupations, suggesting that managerial discretion plays an important role in the allocation of training opportunities. Wage regressions indicate that training duration is positively associated with earnings and that women receive returns to training that are at least as large as those of men. The findings suggest that evaluating gender equality in workplace skill investment requires attention not only to training participation but also to the intensity of training provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonwoo Koo & Jangho Yang & Brian Cozzarin, 2026. "Equal Access, Unequal Investment: Gender Differences in Workplace Training Intensity," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 431-446, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:6:p:431-446
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70050
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:6:p:431-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.