IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i3p232-243.html

Building Legitimacy in the UK Platform Economy: Representative Strategies of Independent and Mainstream Trade Unions

Author

Listed:
  • Mathew Johnson
  • Morgan Rhys Powell
  • Eva Herman

Abstract

In this paper we explore the representative strategies of different trade unions within the UK platform economy, and the efforts to build legitimacy among a disparate workforce. Using data from multiple in‐depth research projects, we find that independent unions and self‐organised groups are competing to build representative claims from the ground up by identifying, amplifying, and acting upon shared grievances rooted in the labour process of platform work. In contrast, traditional unions largely rely on incorporating platform workers into representative structures through formal union membership, recognition agreements, and collective bargaining mechanisms. We argue that while there are differences between labour movement actors in terms of representative strategies, the declining power and legitimacy of the labour movement as a whole means that there remain persistent representation gaps which leave many without a meaningful voice in negotiations with employers and the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathew Johnson & Morgan Rhys Powell & Eva Herman, 2026. "Building Legitimacy in the UK Platform Economy: Representative Strategies of Independent and Mainstream Trade Unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 232-243, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:3:p:232-243
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:3:p:232-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.