IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i2p160-169.html

Sensemaking, Inequity and Agency in a Precarious Transnational Workspace: The Case of International Seafarers

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Bailey
  • Nik Winchester

Abstract

International seafarers are highly trained and certificated workers but are subject to precaritising working conditions. This affects how they understand and respond to perceived inequities in relation to terms and conditions of employment. Drawing on qualitative interview data, this article examines how this group of workers make sense, rationalise and cope with precarious working conditions. In so doing, it: (i) highlights a range of inequities in seafarer terms and conditions of employment; (ii) examines how seafarers make sense of, and respond to, these inequities within a precaritising work context; and (iii) argues that seafarers adopt a pragmatic context‐sensitive approach that allows them to flex between different modes of understanding (i.e., framings) in a manner that is individualised, rational and preserves their sense of agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Bailey & Nik Winchester, 2026. "Sensemaking, Inequity and Agency in a Precarious Transnational Workspace: The Case of International Seafarers," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 160-169, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:160-169
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:160-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.