IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i2p160-169.html

Sensemaking, Inequity and Agency in a Precarious Transnational Workspace: The Case of International Seafarers

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Bailey
  • Nik Winchester

Abstract

International seafarers are highly trained and certificated workers but are subject to precaritising working conditions. This affects how they understand and respond to perceived inequities in relation to terms and conditions of employment. Drawing on qualitative interview data, this article examines how this group of workers make sense, rationalise and cope with precarious working conditions. In so doing, it: (i) highlights a range of inequities in seafarer terms and conditions of employment; (ii) examines how seafarers make sense of, and respond to, these inequities within a precaritising work context; and (iii) argues that seafarers adopt a pragmatic context‐sensitive approach that allows them to flex between different modes of understanding (i.e., framings) in a manner that is individualised, rational and preserves their sense of agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Bailey & Nik Winchester, 2026. "Sensemaking, Inequity and Agency in a Precarious Transnational Workspace: The Case of International Seafarers," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 160-169, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:160-169
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70022
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iain Campbell & Robin Price, 2016. "Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualisation," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(3), pages 314-332, September.
    2. Chris Smith, 2006. "The double indeterminacy of labour power," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(2), pages 389-402, June.
    3. Liam Campling & Alejandro Colás, 2023. "Maritime Labour Regimes in the Neoliberal Era," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 66(1), pages 65-75, June.
    4. Elizabeth R. DeSombre, 2006. "Flagging Standards: Globalization and Environmental, Safety, and Labor Regulations at Sea," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541904, December.
    5. Vera Trappmann & Charles Umney & Christopher J McLachlan & Alexandra Seehaus & Laura Cartwright, 2024. "How Do Young Workers Perceive Job Insecurity? Legitimising Frames for Precarious Work in England and Germany," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 998-1020, August.
    6. Kathleen Griesbach, 2025. "Positioning Stories: Accounting for Insecure Work," American Sociological Review, , vol. 90(3), pages 493-520, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaotian Li, 2023. "Managerial Technique and Worker Subjectivity in Dialogue: Understanding Overwork in China’s Internet Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(6), pages 1699-1716, December.
    2. Yujuico, Emmanuel, 2014. "Demandeur pays: The EU and funding improvements in South Asian ship recycling practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 340-351.
    3. Sharon C. Bolton, 2009. "Getting to the heart of the emotional labour process: a reply to Brook," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 549-560, September.
    4. Alex Veen & Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods, 2020. "Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 388-406, June.
    5. Jason Heyes & Sian Moore & Kirsty Newsome & Mark Tomlinson, 2018. "Living with uncertain work," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 420-437, November.
    6. Isabel Dias & Alexandra Lopes & José Azevedo & Ana Sofia Maia & João Santos Baptista, 2022. "Cleaning in Times of Pandemic: Perceptions of COVID-19 Risks among Workers in Facility Services," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Constantine Manolchev & Richard Saundry & Duncan Lewis, 2021. "Breaking up the ‘precariat’: Personalisation, differentiation and deindividuation in precarious work groups," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(3), pages 828-851, August.
    8. Jean-Etienne Joullié & Robert Spillane, 2021. "The language of integrative collective bargaining," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(3), pages 472-488, September.
    9. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.
    10. Farah Naz & Dieter Bögenhold, 2018. "A contested terrain: Re/conceptualising the well-being of homeworkers," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 328-345, September.
    11. Victor Wong & Tat Chor Au-Yeung, 2019. "Autonomous precarity or precarious autonomy? Dilemmas of young workers in Hong Kong," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(2), pages 241-261, June.
    12. Christine Mayrhuber & Rainer Eppel & Thomas Horvath & Helmut Mahringer, 2020. "Destandardisierung von Erwerbsverläufen und Rückwirkungen auf die Alterssicherung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66001.
    13. Michal Carrington & Andreas Chatzidakis & Deirdre Shaw, 2021. "Consuming Worker Exploitation? Accounts and Justifications for Consumer (In)action to Modern Slavery," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(3), pages 432-450, June.
    14. Paul Edwards & Andy Hodder, 2022. "Conflict and control in the contemporary workplace: Structured antagonism revisited," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 220-240, May.
    15. Anita Hammer & Ayman Adham, 2023. "Mobility Power, State and the ‘Sponsored Labour Regime’ in Saudi Capitalism," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(6), pages 1497-1516, December.
    16. Birgit Apitzsch & Maximiliane Wilkesmann & Caroline Ruiner & Mona Bassyiouny & Ronny Ehlen & Lena Schulz, 2023. "Labour market collectivism: New solidarities of highly skilled freelance workers in medicine, IT and the film industry," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 1149-1175, November.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:y943w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jacques Bélanger & Paul Edwards, 2007. "The Conditions Promoting Compromise in the Workplace," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 713-734, December.
    19. Laurence Romani & Patrizia Zanoni & Lotte Holck, 2021. "Radicalizing diversity (research): Time to resume talking about class," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 8-23, January.
    20. Ryan Lorraine & MacMahon Juliet & O’Sullivan Michelle & Turner Thomas & Lavelle Jonathan & Murphy Caroline & O’Brien Mike & Gunnigle Patrick, 2019. "The Same but Different: Regulating Zero Hours Work in Two Liberal Market Economies," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 3-15, December.
    21. Thomas Hastings & Danny MacKinnon, 2017. "Re-embedding agency at the workplace scale: Workers and labour control in Glasgow call centres," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(1), pages 104-120, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:160-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.