IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i2p127-139.html

Why and How Workers Choose Less Work for Less Money: A Mixed‐Methods Study on a Working Time Reduction Scheme in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago Guimarães
  • Miklós Antal
  • Benedikt Lehmann

Abstract

This study examines workers' motives for joining or rejecting a voluntary 28‐h work‐time reduction scheme in Germany. Using a mixed‐methods design that combines semi‐structured interviews and a survey of eligible employees, we analyse how personal, financial, and professional considerations shape decisions about shorter hours. Two main motivational categories emerge: a desire for greater work‐life balance, and concerns about income loss and career impact. Findings highlight how uncertainty affects perceived opportunities and risks differently: even without clear time‐use plans shorter hours can be chosen to increase autonomy, but they are rejected confidently to avoid professional or financial risks. This underlines the value of qualitative research with open‐ended questions and the potential strategic relevance of latent desires to reduce hours among workers who are currently reluctant to consider such options.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago Guimarães & Miklós Antal & Benedikt Lehmann, 2026. "Why and How Workers Choose Less Work for Less Money: A Mixed‐Methods Study on a Working Time Reduction Scheme in Germany," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 127-139, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:127-139
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:127-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.