IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v56y2025i5p382-396.html

The Sea Change in UK Strike Statistics, Implications for Public Policy, and Misrepresentation of the 2022–2023 Strike Surge

Author

Listed:
  • Dave Lyddon

Abstract

The UK state has collected data on strike activity for over a century, to inform public policy on industrial relations. This involved creating and maintaining a consistent and reliable data set, despite inevitable limitations and funding pressures. Yet how the Office for National Statistics now constructs and presents its statistics on strikes, collected through the Labour Disputes Inquiry, has been radically transformed. Two revisions to the definition of a ‘stoppage’, departing from International Labour Organisation resolutions, have broken the consistency of this longstanding series. The most egregious is that a multi‐employer strike (such as in health or education), or a multi‐union strike, no longer constitutes just one but multiple stoppages (of each employer and of each union), resulting in an ‘explosion’ of recorded stoppage numbers. Weaknesses in data collection and presentation compound these difficulties. Not only are the dimensions of the 2022–2023 strike surge misrepresented, but the historic role of strike statistics in informing public policy is now undermined. Recommendations are made on how to improve the ONS's published strike data.

Suggested Citation

  • Dave Lyddon, 2025. "The Sea Change in UK Strike Statistics, Implications for Public Policy, and Misrepresentation of the 2022–2023 Strike Surge," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 382-396, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:5:p:382-396
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12474
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Pullinger, 1997. "The Creation of the Office for National Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 65(3), pages 291-308, December.
    2. Dave Lyddon, 2021. "Strike ballots under the 2016 Trade Union Act: Unions mobilise to counter the latest legal onslaught," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 479-501, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Smith, 2025. "Trade Unions, the Right to Strike and the Political Economy of Labour: The Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 397-410, September.
    2. Ioulia Bessa & Andy Hodder & John Kelly, 2025. "Why Do So Many People Not Vote? Correlates of Participation in Trade Union Strike Ballots," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(2), pages 290-310, April.
    3. Martin Zagler, 2006. "Does Economic Growth Exhibit A Different Impact On Job Creation And Job Destruction?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 53(5), pages 672-683, November.
    4. John Pullinger, 2013. "Statistics making an impact," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(4), pages 819-840, October.
    5. Andy Hodder & Stephen Mustchin, 2025. "Measuring the 2022–2023 strike wave in Britain: ballots, participation and methodological implications," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 46-74, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:5:p:382-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.