IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v56y2025i4p291-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic Capitalism and Precarity in the Neoliberal University: Job Insecurity and Stress in Two Liberal Market Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Sean O'Brady
  • Greg J. Bamber
  • Brian Cooper

Abstract

This study analyses the relationship between academic capitalism and employment precarity. Drawing on two cross‐national sources of survey data, we compare academics' experiences with job insecurity and related stress in Australian and Canadian universities during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Although these two countries are similar liberal market economies, Australian higher education has embraced academic capitalism to a greater extent than in Canada. Against this backdrop, our study focuses on the moderating role of ‘soft income’ from international tuition fees and the use of contingent labour in explaining cross‐country differences. We find that international tuition played a role in heightening job insecurity and associated stress, particularly in the Australian universities due to their greater reliance on this source of income. However, these outcomes converged for ‘permanent’ and ‘casual’ academics in Australia but diverged in Canada. We contend that the cross‐national differentiation is likely due to the weaker job protections afforded to permanent academics in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean O'Brady & Greg J. Bamber & Brian Cooper, 2025. "Academic Capitalism and Precarity in the Neoliberal University: Job Insecurity and Stress in Two Liberal Market Economies," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 291-300, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:4:p:291-300
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:4:p:291-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.