IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v26y2002i4p815-822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bring back big government

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W. Lake

Abstract

Despite widespread claims of its demise, the national state is the scale of the state institution best able to marshal the political, discursive and material resources necessary to achieve goals of social justice, defined as a decrease in income inequality, at local, national and global scales. The appearance of the withering away of the state is deceptive, since it is the state itself that is enacting the distribution of functions that some observers interpret as a reduction in state power. The arguments for a return of big government are both strategic and tactical. Strategically, central government has been responsible for every major social policy advance in the United States in the twentieth century. Tactically, the institutions comprising decentralized governance, including local governments, non–profit foundations and community–based organizations, are inadequate to the task. The role of big government in pursuit of social justice entails discursive and regulatory functions, each in turn suggesting an attendant political project for academics and activists. What is at stake is not a quantitative redistribution of state power but a qualitative redirection of the purposes to which that power is applied. Uncritical insistence on the end of the nation state may create a self–defeating self–fulfilling prophecy that conceals important opportunities for political realignment. L’Etat nation est à la meilleure échelle pour mobiliser les ressources politiques, discursives et matérielles nécessaires à la poursuite de la justice sociale, définie comme la réduction des inégalités de revenu aux échelles locales, nationales et globales, et ce malgré les affirmations répandues sur le retrait de l’Etat. L’apparence d’effacement de l’Etat est trompeuse puisque c’est l’Etat luui même qui organise la réallocation des fonctions que certains observateurs interprètent comme une réduction du pouvoir de l’Etat. L’argument en faveur d’un retour du ‘big government’ sont à la fois stratégiques et tactiques. D’un point de vue stratégique, le gouvernement central a été responsable de toutes les grandes avancées sociales du Xxème siècle aux USA. Sur le plan tactique, les institutions de gouvernance décentralisée comprenant le gouvernement local, les fondations à but non lucratif et les organisations communautaires ne peuvent pas faire face à ces tâches. Le rôle du gouvernement dans la poursuite de la justice sociale comprend des fonctions régulatives et discursives, chacune d’entre elle renvoyant à des projets politiques pour les activistes et les universitaires. Ce n’est pas la réallocation de l’autorité qui est en jeu mais une réorientation des objectifs du pouvoir. L’accent mis sans réserve sur la fin de l’Etat nation pourrait crééer une prophétie auto–créatrice auto–défaitiste qui dissimulerait les vraies opportunités de réorientation politique.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W. Lake, 2002. "Bring back big government," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 815-822, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:26:y:2002:i:4:p:815-822
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00420
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. & Fisher, Micah R. & Erbaugh, J.T. & Intarini, Dian & Dharmiasih, Wiwik & Makmur, Muliadi & Faturachmat, Fatwa & Verheijen, Bart & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2020. "The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:26:y:2002:i:4:p:815-822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.