IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v26y2002i3p494-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Weltoffenheit schafft Jobs’: Turkish entrepreneurship and multiculturalism in Berlin

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Pécoud

Abstract

This article investigates the connections between multiculturalism, unemployment and self–employment in the case of Berlin’s Turkish economy. It first describes five trends that are currently shaping German–Turks’ business activities: heterogeneity, hybridity, professionalism, internationalization and state interest. The consequences of these five trends are partly contradictory. On the one hand, they challenge the relevance of the ‘Turkish economy’ concept. On the other hand, they give an unprecedented respectability to the ‘Turkish economy’, thus popularizing this concept. The article argues that this contradiction should be interpreted as an outcome of the growing importance of multiculturalism in Germany’s relation to immigrants. Acknowledging the presence of immigrants has led to an emphasis on their high rate of self–employment, viewed as a possible solution to their unemployment and ‘integration’ problems. What emerges is the economic dimension of multiculturalism, i.e. an ideology that sees immigration and ethnic pluralism as economically positive. The article concludes by a critical analysis of this ideology. Cet article étudie les liens entre multiculturalisme, chômage et entreprise individuelle dans le cas de l’économie turque berlinoise. Il décrit d’abord cinq tendances qui configurent actuellement l’activitééconomique des Germano–turcs: hétérogénéité, hybridité, professionnalisme, internationalisation et intérêt de l’État. Les conséquences de ces cinq tendances sont en partie contradictoires. D’un côté, elles remettent en question le concept ‘d’économie turque’ et, de l’autre, elles lui offrent une respectabilité sans précédent, propageant ainsi le concept. Cette contradiction devrait être interprétée comme le résultat de l’importance croissante du multiculturalisme dans la relation de l’Allemagne à l’égard des immigrants. Reconnaître la présence d’immigrés a conduit à souligner le rôle important des entrepreneurs, considérés comme une solution possible à leurs problèmes de chômage et ‘d’intégration’. Est ainsi révélée la dimension économique du multiculturalisme, c’est–à–dire une idéologie qui voit l’immigration et le pluralisme ethnique comme économiquement positifs. La conclusion expose une analyse critique de cette idéologie.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Pécoud, 2002. "‘Weltoffenheit schafft Jobs’: Turkish entrepreneurship and multiculturalism in Berlin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 494-507, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:494-507
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00395
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emília Malcata Rebelo, 2010. "Does Urban Concentration/Dispersion Affect Immigrants' Professional Opportunities? The case of the Porto Metropolitan Area," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 586-610, September.
    2. Alessandro Arrighetti & Daniela Bolzani & Andrea Lasagni, 2014. "Beyond the enclave? Break-outs into mainstream markets and multicultural hybridism in ethnic firms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9-10), pages 753-777, December.
    3. Ibrahim Sirkeci, 2016. "Transnational Döner Kebab taking over the UK," Transnational Marketing Journal, Oxbridge Publishing House, UK, vol. 4(2), pages 143-158, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:494-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.