IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i3p620-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Report of a Mixed‐Methods Assessment of Patient Experiences to Inform Quality Improvement in an Emergency Department in Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • María Florencia Grande Ratti
  • Noelia De Masi
  • Leonardo Garfi
  • Lucila Hornstein
  • Esteban Rochina
  • Maria De La Paz Rodriguez
  • Ana Soledad Pedretti
  • Bernardo Julio Martinez

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explore how an emergency department in Argentina collected patient experience perspectives using varied tools to inform improvement activities. A case report of a mixed‐methods assessment of patient experiences to inform quality improvement in an Emergency Department in Argentina. This study was conducted from July 2022 to December 2023 at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Data collection was based on different resources: (a) Net Promoter Score Survey; (b) Buyer Persona, defined as a semi‐fictional representation of your ideal customer based on market research and real data about your existing customers; (c) Empathy Maps, a tool which aids in understanding another person's perspective and empathises with the thoughts, feelings, needs, and behaviours; (d) Customer Journey Map, a visual representation that outlines the various stages and touchpoints a customer goes through when interacting with service. Data was analysed following an iterative process (plan→act→observe→reflect). Its analysis served to understand and improve the design, development, and implementation plans. The results helped to model the patient's journey pattern and understand users' profiles. Therefore, we used the information to support the organisation's improvement process. For example, although wait time is a major driver in this setting, provider and staff communication is critically important. Excellent communication and perceived empathy mitigate long waits, overcrowded environments, and other challenges (such as infrastructure and comfort). This case example can guide the future efforts of healthcare managers and key stakeholders in making decisions about how a service can use empathy‐based tools to improve the patient experience.

Suggested Citation

  • María Florencia Grande Ratti & Noelia De Masi & Leonardo Garfi & Lucila Hornstein & Esteban Rochina & Maria De La Paz Rodriguez & Ana Soledad Pedretti & Bernardo Julio Martinez, 2025. "A Case Report of a Mixed‐Methods Assessment of Patient Experiences to Inform Quality Improvement in an Emergency Department in Argentina," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 620-629, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:620-629
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3906
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:620-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.