IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i2p368-380.html

Using Learning Health System Principles to Embed Patient Experience Data in Primary Care: A Qualitative Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Louise A. Ellis
  • Georgia Fisher
  • Kate Churruca
  • Maree Saba
  • Tanja Schroeder
  • Janani Mahadeva
  • Sanjyot Vagholkar
  • Mark Yang Lee
  • Reema Harrison
  • Simon Willcock
  • Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract

Background Though an important component of high‐quality healthcare, the routine collection of patient experience data is limited in primary care, as is the evidence for how this data is being used for quality improvement. This study used a learning health system (LHS) framework to describe how a university‐affiliated community general practice is integrating patient experience data into service and quality improvement efforts, and to identify barriers and facilitators. Methods A co‐designed qualitative case study was conducted with academic researchers and staff from a university‐affiliated general practice in Australia. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted in April 2024 with practice staff, and transcripts were deductively coded according to a five‐domain learning health systems framework, and with additional codes capturing barriers and facilitators. Results Eighteen (53%) practice staff were interviewed, including general practitioners (n = 11), a practice nurse (n = 1), and administrative staff (n = 6). Participants identified multiple methods through which the practice captured the patient experience that spanned all domains of the LHS framework. However, there was less evidence of a coherent quality improvement strategy being employed, with associated barriers identified around staff workloads, training, and existing government funding policies. Key facilitators to the use of patient experience data included: membership of a larger health organisation and university; key dedicated administrative and clinical roles; and effective leadership, governance structures and policies to support continuous learning and drive service improvement. Conclusion This study presents a case example of how patient experience data is being integrated into general practice and identifies key barriers and facilitators to initiating and translating this data for continuous healthcare improvement. By mapping the use of patient experience data to a LHS framework, this study shows how LHS principles can be applied to primary care to facilitate the capture and use of patient experience data on an ongoing basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise A. Ellis & Georgia Fisher & Kate Churruca & Maree Saba & Tanja Schroeder & Janani Mahadeva & Sanjyot Vagholkar & Mark Yang Lee & Reema Harrison & Simon Willcock & Jeffrey Braithwaite, 2025. "Using Learning Health System Principles to Embed Patient Experience Data in Primary Care: A Qualitative Investigation," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 368-380, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:368-380
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3880
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise Ellis & Janet Long & Chiara Pomare & Zeyad Mahmoud & Rebecca Lake & Genevieve Dammery & Jeffrey Braithwaite, 2022. "Mapping continuous learning using social network research: a social network study of Australian Genomics as a Learning Health System," Post-Print hal-04256098, HAL.
    2. Obucina, M. & Harris, N. & Fitzgerald, J.A. & Chai, A. & Radford, K. & Ross, A. & Carr, L. & Vecchio, N., 2018. "The application of triple aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 900-907.
    3. M Obucina & N Harris & JA Fitzgerald & A Chai & K Radford & A Ross & L Carr & N Vecchio, 2018. "The Triple Aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201804, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willemine Willems, 2021. "Countering the Tragedy of the Health Care Commons by Exnovation: Bringing Unexpected Problems and Solutions into View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Álvaro Fuentes-Merlos & Domingo Orozco-Beltrán & Jose A. Quesada Rico & Raul Reina, 2021. "Quality-of-Life Determinants in People with Diabetes Mellitus in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Kokko, Petra, 2022. "Improving the value of healthcare systems using the Triple Aim framework: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(4), pages 302-309.
    4. Aidan R. Vining & Anthony E. Boardman, 2026. "Cost–benefit analysis and ‘next best’ methods to evaluate the efficiency of social policies: As in pitching horseshoes, closeness matters," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(1), pages 17-41, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:368-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.