IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v8y2017is4p94-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Policies towards Egypt: The Civil Security Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Helmut K. Anheier
  • Robert Falkner
  • Ahmed Abd Rabou

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Ahmed Abd Rabou, 2017. "EU Policies towards Egypt: The Civil Security Paradox," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s4), pages 94-99, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:94-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1758-5899.12428
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nordlinger, Eric A., 1970. "Soldiers in Mufti: The Impact of Military Rule Upon Economic and Social Change in the Non-Western States1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(4), pages 1131-1148, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William J. Dixon & Bruce E. Moon, 1986. "The Military Burden and Basic Human Needs," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(4), pages 660-684, December.
    2. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:94-99 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bennett, Daniel L. & Bjørnskov, Christian & Gohmann, Stephan F., 2019. "Coups, Regime Transitions, and Institutional Change," Working Paper Series 1281, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    4. Ekkart Zimmermann, 1979. "Explaining military coups d'etat: Towards the development of a complex causal model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 431-441, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:94-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.