IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i5p840-851.html

Dialog for the Sake of Dialog: Obstacles to China–EU Climate and Environmental Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Pongratz
  • Wiebke Rabe

Abstract

In light of the United States' withdrawal from and re‐entry into the Paris Agreement, climate relations between the European Union and China warrant closer inspection. As the second‐ and third‐largest cumulative emitters after the United States, their cooperation has a global impact. This paper assesses the current state of their climate and environmental engagement and analyzes post‐COVID‐19 obstacles affecting this dimension of their relations. Based on interview data, we show that the increasing institutionalization of climate and environmental cooperation has not resulted in improved outcomes. Instead, such engagement remains limited to dialog for the sake of dialog rather than substantive collaboration. We identify four key obstacles to cooperation: perceptual, capacity‐related, institutional, and interest‐based. This paper addresses pertinent questions about the viability and practicality of joint climate action in the context of rising geopolitical tensions. Our findings contribute to scholarship on global climate governance and EU–China relations, and we propose an analytical framework to inform future research and policy debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Pongratz & Wiebke Rabe, 2025. "Dialog for the Sake of Dialog: Obstacles to China–EU Climate and Environmental Cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 840-851, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:840-851
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:840-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.