IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i1p86-97.html

Community self‐protection, public authority and the safety of strangers in Bor and Ler, South Sudan

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Kirk
  • Naomi Pendle
  • Abraham Diing Akoi

Abstract

Protection is not simply something done or delivered to people by states, humanitarian organisations and armed peacekeepers. Instead, a growing literature has begun to examine the self‐protection strategies of people and communities in protracted violent crises. Its authors suggest that nuanced understandings of how people retain a measure of agency in the face of violence is an important first step for those seeking to reduce their levels of threat and vulnerability. We use interview data from communities in Bor and Ler, South Sudan, long affected by conflict, to show how attention to the relationship between public authority and the safety of strangers can reveal the skills, resources and conditions under which protection is successfully provided. This also helps to re‐root ‘protection’ in local vernaculars that more closely resemble its everyday use among South Sudanese and offers entry points for humanitarian interventions with more realistic prospects of positive outcomes for communities sceptical of humanitarians' broken promises to protect.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Kirk & Naomi Pendle & Abraham Diing Akoi, 2025. "Community self‐protection, public authority and the safety of strangers in Bor and Ler, South Sudan," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(1), pages 86-97, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:86-97
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13364
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naomi Pendle, 2017. "Contesting the militarization of the places where they met: the landscapes of the western Nuer and Dinka (South Sudan)," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 64-85, January.
    2. Naomi Ruth Pendle, 2020. "Politics, prophets and armed mobilizations: competition and continuity over registers of authority in South Sudan’s conflicts," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 43-62, January.
    3. Naomi Pendle, 2021. "Competing authorities and norms of restraint: governing community-embedded armed groups in South Sudan," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 873-897, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvia A. N. Nannyonga‐Tamusuza & Naomi Pendle, 2025. "Sing safety: Understanding South Sudanese protection strategies through song," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(1), pages 150-160, February.
    2. Naomi Pendle & Tom Kirk, 2025. "The Safety of Strangers: The Realities and Politics of Protecting Civilians in Times of War," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(1), pages 64-68, February.
    3. Naomi Pendle, 2023. "Law and Famine: Learning from the Hunger Courts in South Sudan," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(3), pages 467-489, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:86-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.