IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i1p213-217.html

Maximizing STEM resources for diplomats: A framework for speed, depth, and accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of science diplomacy, frontline diplomats increasingly rely on effective access to STEM knowledge to advance national interests and address global challenges. This paper presents a framework organizations can use for evaluating the approaches and tools available to their frontline diplomats, focusing on three key metrics: response time (speed), content depth and applicability, and consistency in accuracy. By evaluating tools via these metrics, the framework highlights the need for mechanisms that offer quick access to in‐depth and reliable STEM information, thus optimizing diplomatic effectiveness. The study provides examples from the US foreign affairs perspective within categories such as web searches, training programs, and consulting services, identifying opportunities for innovation and improvement. Identifying tools that maximize speed, depth, and accuracy, this framework aims to guide organizations in refining their resources, thereby equipping diplomats with the tools necessary to navigate complex, science‐driven global issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert, 2025. "Maximizing STEM resources for diplomats: A framework for speed, depth, and accuracy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(1), pages 213-217, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:213-217
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13468
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake Su & Jean‐Christophe Mauduit & Douglas Momberg & Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert, 2024. "Strengthening links between science and technology experts and frontline diplomats to address science diplomacy challenges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(5), pages 928-936, November.
    2. Vaughan Turekian, 2018. "The Evolution of Science Diplomacy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 5-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrei Polejack & Sigi Gruber & Mary S. Wisz, 2021. "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Blake Su & Jean‐Christophe Mauduit & Douglas Momberg & Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert, 2024. "Strengthening links between science and technology experts and frontline diplomats to address science diplomacy challenges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(5), pages 928-936, November.
    3. Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert & Mia Peterson & Douglas Momberg, 2025. "Operationalizing Science and Technology Initiatives for Conflict Mitigation: A Strategic Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1125-1134, November.
    4. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Boris Mattoš & Michaela Grinaj & Paskal Zhelev, 2025. "Science diplomacy in small states: a case study of global players’ engagement in Slovakia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 1-1.
    7. Casper Andersen & Cristina Clopot & Jan Ifversen, 2020. "Heritage and interculturality in EU science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Diego Lawler & Miguel Fuentes, 2022. "Presidential diplomacy meets science diplomacy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(4), pages 606-613, September.
    9. Alexander Raev & Ellen Minkman, 2020. "Emotional policies: Introducing branding as a tool for science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Elias G. Carayannis & John Draper & Balwant Bhaneja, 2021. "Towards Fusion Energy in the Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 Context: Call for a Global Commission for Urgent Action on Fusion Energy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1891-1904, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:213-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.