IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v26y2019i5p738-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management gender composition and the gender pay gap: Evidence from British panel data

Author

Listed:
  • Dragana Stojmenovska

Abstract

Women continue to earn less than their male counterparts globally. Scholars and feminist activists have suggested a partial explanation for this gender gap in earnings could be women's limited access to power structures at the workplace. Using the linked employer–employee data of the Workplace Employment Relations Study 2004–2011, this article asks what happens to the gender gap in earnings among non‐managerial employees when the share of women in management at the workplace increases. The findings, based on workplace‐fixed time‐fixed effects regression models, suggest that workplace‐level increases in the share of women in management are associated with decreases of the non‐managerial gender gap in earnings. This effect appears to be largely unrelated to changes in equality and diversity policies, family‐friendly arrangements and support for carers at the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragana Stojmenovska, 2019. "Management gender composition and the gender pay gap: Evidence from British panel data," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 738-764, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:738-764
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12264
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clotilde Coron, 2020. "Equal pay index for men and women: The performative power of quantification conventions," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1418-1437, November.
    2. Charlotte Kräft, 2022. "Equal pay behind the “Glass Door”? The gender gap in upper management in a male‐dominated industry," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1910-1926, November.
    3. Clotilde Coron, 2022. "The gender-job satisfaction debate in the light of the "gendered organizations"," Post-Print halshs-03808294, HAL.
    4. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marzena Podgorska & Anna Musiol-Urbanczyk & Maciej Wolny, 2020. "Sustainable Development and Motivation Opportunities from the Perspective of Women in the Polish Science Sector in the Light of Statistical Data and Surveys," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 456-473.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:738-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.